UKIP if you want to
There’s something or other that bit different about the
United Kingdom Independence Party.
I say ‘something or other’ because one senses that to use the
conversational French expression for that phrase would be inappropriate, and
might provoke something of an Anglo Saxon response from any UKIP member.
And what is the right title for a UKIP party member? ‘UKIPper’ sounds a bit too upbeat for a
collection of people that, whenever they appear on the telly, appear furious
about something, usually about having a camera pointed at them come to think of
it. ‘Kipper’ then? ‘Kipper’ sounds about right as, if they
are anything like their fuming Beloved Leader, they are no strangers to
smoking.
So what is it that’s just that bit different about
Kippers? Well, they are probably
not alone in starting sentences at dinner parties with ‘I’m not a racist but…’
but they are probably alone in having conversations like that before the first
course is uncorked, and talking about that sort of thing to the exclusion of
everything else.
These are the sort of people who make it very clear that
they get on very well with foreigners, and make a point of telling you that
they know the name of the lady who cleans their office, and she’s foreign. One presumes. Never spoken to her but she wears a headscarf.
The Kipper worldview is that things were a lot better in the
1950s. This is, of course, utter
tosh and if anyone wants to argue, I advise them to first pop back to the
mid-50s in the time machine of their choice and try to stream Netflix.
By the way, the time machine of choice is always the Time
Machine from the classic film of the same title. Blue police boxes are fine, as are gullwing sports cars, but
any time traveller who decides to fling themselves into an uncertain future at
a rate greater than the standard one second per second, and does so in a
machine built around a comfy armchair, deserves huge respect. Indeed, a comfy armchair is a reliable
way to travel into the future in the conventional way, meaning you arrive at
your destination, say lunchtime or when the pub opens, refreshed and ready for
action.
To the media, the Kippers are an amusing distraction posing
no real threat. Unlike
conventional far right political movements that shave their heads and beat up
ethnic minorities, Kippers are usually sedate right up to the point when they
say something so unbelievably racist your arse clenches so hard it
squeaks. Then they keep on talking
as if nothing had happened.
There is a school of thought that Kippers are not racist at
all, and that they just consider that the EU is a failed project that the UK
would be better off out of.
Judging by what’s reported however, that’s far too sophisticated a
school of thought. The school of
thought occupied by UKIP is not one, one feels, that would be highly rated by
Ofstead. More likely, Kippers
consider that the EU is a failed experiment of the type usually devised by mad
foreign scientists in old Universal movies and the UK, or more precisely the
paler parts of the UK, would be much better off out of it. It would mean we could pass our own
laws, eat whatever cheese we wanted, and birch homos without some jumped up
foreign judge who has never touched cheddar in his life.
The media bloody love Kippers but I’m not sure what’s more
dangerous, taking them seriously or not taking them seriously? A sixty minute programme about the
economic impacts of EU policies on, say, fish, would hardly make for riveting
viewing, but a slightly overweight woman with views even more worrying than her
hairstyle, who is not afraid to express those views? Now we’re talking, usually about forigners.
The interesting thing is that all the mainstream political
parties dislike UKIP, either because it poses a threat to their share of the
vote or because their policies are repugnant. Part of the English national character is to side with the
underdog, and maybe that’s part of the appeal of being a Kipper, and proud.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home