Showing results for 'Racist Arsehole'
Permanent petulant Li’ll Donnie has been sheeting* again.
This time, the subject of his ill-considered emission is
Google, specifically how, when you search for news, a lot of the results are
critical of the ‘policies’ of the subject doing the Googling.
If that is indeed the case, and it may well be for reasons
so obvious they can be understood by moss then it is, at least on one level,
surprising.
Surprising because over years the internet has moved from
being the place where you could go for almost limitless knowledge, and
limitless opinion, to the place that you go to for almost limitless knowledge,
almost limitless ignorance, and a hell of a lot of opinions that align with
your own.
No doubt it is the inevitable result of more and more stuff
being put on the internet, so the chances of coming across a comforting
endorsement of your own views, however niche those views might be and even if
the allied opinion is expressed in the comments section of a teen’s
instagrammed selfie, is moderately certain. Alternatively, you could just go the media outlet or nutcase
conspiracy website of your choice to have your vile (Daily Mail) or smug
(Guardian) views endorsed.
Ah, for the days when the internet was the home of chatrooms
and bulletin boards that were wee digital salons where great matters were
discussed. Yes, I am talking about
the debate about who the greatest Star trek captain was+. Again.
Apparently, when li’ll Donnie Googles presumably himself, he
is confronted with negative news stories.
This is probably because it is difficult to be objective,
and positive, about Li’ll Donnie.
It should come as no surprise to anyone but a tan-addled
buffoon that the internet tends to be negative about authority figures. And it does not matter who they are or
what they have done (obvious honourable exception is Nelson Mandala). Look at Aung San Suu Kyi, somebody who
is not enjoying a whole lot of positive press at the moment, and she’s got a
Nobel peace prize (details correct at time of publishing). Even if you fade from politics and try
and rehabilitate yourself, you are still fair game. In 1997 Michael Portillo exited politics in a ‘where were
you when Portillo went?’ teevee moment that was as shocking as it was
hysterical. Everyone viewing
reached for their dictionary to look up if ‘hubris’ meant what they thought it
meant. Since then, he has made a
series of steam-porn documentaries for the BBC where he affably wanders round
Britain, guided by a guide book decades out of date. Now he is mocked merely for his choice of attire, rather
than repulsive views and making life difficult for millions when in power.
Former PM David Cameron is very much not rehabilitated. Never mind gurning selfies from
festivals, the bloke could post pictures of a UK wide tour of him in an ice-cream
van dolling out free lollies to the kiddies, and the reaction would probably be
that he is either a peado or, worse, is actively contributing to childhood
obesity levels.
It’s doubtful, of course, that Li’ll Donnie even knows what
an algorithm is or how one might be applied to sifting and sorting results for
news searches. It’s doubtful that
he has an understanding that his action of putting children in cages, like the
fucking Child Catcher, is likely to inspire at least mild criticism. It’s doubtful that he understands
anything that can’t be expressed on the front of a baseball hat. He probably doesn’t know how to click
past page one of Google results.
He certainly has yet to learn that you never, ever, Google
your own name. the best result is
that you will find that there is somebody with your name who is more famous
than you, obviously, and will probably be younger, richer and less tubby than
you. Worst case is that you, your
actual self, are somewhere at the top of that first page, because that means
that you have done something to attract the attention of a third party on the
internet and, unless you are Nelson Mandela or James T. Kirk, the results are
not going to be favourable.
* ‘Sheeting’ is a hybrid term that I’ve invented that I’m
hoping will be, if not word of the year 2019, then at least accepted by some
sort of urban dictionary with really, really low standards. It’s a mash-up of ‘Shit’ and ‘Tweeting’
and describes the process of making an ignorant statement on Twitter. In short, the digital equivalent of
talking out of your arse. For
instance ‘I see Linaker’s been sheeting about a top four finish for Man U this
season’.
+ Kirk. Obvs.
Labels: America, Celebrity, Google, Guardian newspaper, Internet, News, Twitter